Alabama State House
Alabama State House
//

Voting Rights Act Preserved in Impactful Supreme Court Ruling for Black Alabama Voters

In a pivotal 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court sided with black Alabama voters in the Allen v. Milligan case, stating that Alabama's state government had violated the Voting Rights Act through gerrymandering. This decision mandates a redrawing of Alabama's congressional district map to accurately reflect racial demographics and is expected to influence similar redistricting efforts in Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas.

1 min read

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of black Alabama voters in an important redistricting case. The decision for Allen v. Milligan was decided on Thursday, June 8th. The conservative majority Supreme Court surprisingly sided with black voters, who believed that Alabama’s state government was gerrymandering and violating the Voting Rights Act.

Advertisement

Gerrymandering is when politicians redraw electoral districts to help one political party gain more votes. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 made discriminatory voting practices illegal, especially ones that targeted black voters in southern states.

It was determined that Alabama had split up its districts in such a way as to increase the number of majority-white congressional districts. As a result, only one black-majority district exists, despite Alabama being 26% black.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court concluded that black people’s voting power was being reduced. This lack of fair representation violates the Voting Rights Act. Back in October, Alabama defended itself by saying its redistricting approach was race-neutral, but this defense was rejected.

The 5-4 ruling means that Alabama’s congressional district map will be redrawn in such a way that each district’s racial demographics are accurate. To make up for the past violations, a new district with a considerable black population will be made official by next year’s election.

Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas are three southern states that are expected to redraw their discriminatory maps due to this decision.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.